This strategy works because those who tell the truth tend to remember the actual events more easily, even if they alter the order of the story. In contrast, those who fabricate a story may find it difficult to rearrange events, since the narrative is not based on real memories, but on an improvised construction.
Trying to reconstruct a story in reverse increases cognitive effort, which can lead to longer pauses, contradictions, or gaps in the narrative. These inconsistencies don’t automatically prove someone is lying, but they can indicate that the story requires further analysis
The second key question seeks to elicit unexpected or very specific details about the sequence of events. For example, one might ask who else was present, what was happening around them at that moment, or what occurred immediately before or after the described situation.::::amajoud
When someone recounts a true event, they often also recall secondary aspects of the incident, even if they aren’t the central theme of the story. These include details of the surroundings, conversations that took place nearby, or minor actions that occurred in the context of the main event.
